Nicholas Blake-Knox
Partner
Ireland
Oct 9, 2024
Key takeaways
On 27 September 2024, the Central Bank of Ireland (the "Central Bank") published its process clarification with respect to UCITS and AIF fund name changes following the publication of ESMA's guidelines on funds' names using ESG or sustainability-related terms (the "Guidelines") earlier this year.
In addition, the Central Bank has confirmed that the "fast-track" process it introduced in February 2023, to facilitate updates to pre-contractual disclosures in order to provide information to investors on investments in taxonomy-aligned fossil gas and nuclear economic activities will close effective 18 October 2024.
ESG Fund Naming Rules
Following a consultation in November 2022 with the aim of developing a set of guidelines on fund names which contain ESG or sustainability-related terms, on 21 August 2024, ESMA published the Guidelines as translated in all official EU languages. The Guidelines seek to address the potential risk of greenwashing in fund names by introducing quantitative thresholds criteria for the use of ESG- and sustainability-related terminology. During the consultation, ESMA had outlined its view that a fund name can have a significant impact on an investor's investment decision that the objective of the Guidelines was to ensure that investors are protected against unsubstantiated or exaggerated sustainability claims in fund names while also providing asset managers with clear and measurable criteria to assess their ability to use ESG or sustainability-related terms in fund names.
The Central Bank has now established a streamlined filing process in order to facilitate the implementation of the Guidelines for funds that are obliged to change their names. This streamlined process is limited solely to name changes required to comply with the Guidelines and cannot be used to make additional changes to the relevant offering documents or to effect a reclassification of the fund disclosures pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 ("SFDR").
Pre-Contractual and Periodic Reporting Annexes
On 20 February 2023, legislation1 amending the provisions of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 ("SFDR Level 2") came into force obliging fund management companies with Article 8 or Article 9 funds to make the required disclosures including using updated pre-contractual annexes in order to include information on investments in taxonomy-aligned fossil gas and nuclear economic activities.
To facilitate this update, the Central Bank had introduced a fast-track filing process for required pre-contractual updates in the offering documents of SFDR Article 8 and Article 9 funds. This SFDR Level 2 fast-track filing process is now set to end.
The Central Bank has now confirmed that fund name changes and corresponding updates to fund prospectuses required to comply with the requirements set out in the Guidelines can be effected via submission to the dedicated SFDR mailbox SFDR@centralbank.ie. For other SFDR-related amendments or re-classification filings the Central Bank's standard post-authorisation processes apply.
UCITS management companies and alternative investment fund managers seeking to avail of the fast-track will be required to certify compliance of the revised fund name with the Guidelines via an attestation that must be submitted to the Central Bank with the request seeking a change of name of the relevant UCITS or AIF.
The attestation should state that:
We have set out the key dates of the transition period for the Guidelines and the Central Bank's process in the table below. The table also includes confirmation of the effective date of the closure of the fast-track process for the SFDR Level 2 updates.
By way of reminder, a summary of the key provisions of the Guidelines are appended to this briefing.
Appendix
Summary of requirements under the Guidelines
80% Minimum threshold
The Guidelines establish that to be able to use social-, environmental-, governance-, transition-, sustainability-related and impact-related terms, a minimum threshold of 80% of investments should be used to meet environmental or social characteristics or sustainable investment objectives in accordance with the binding elements of the investment strategy.
Sustainability-related terms – meaningful investment in sustainable investments
In addition, for those funds with sustainability-related terms in their name, they must commit to invest meaningfully in "sustainable investments" as defined under SFDR.
Impact- and transition-related terms
When using any "impact"-related word, ESMA has noted that fund managers must ensure that the investments under the minimum threshold are made with the intention to generate positive, measurable social or environmental impact alongside financial return. When using any "transition"-related word fund managers should demonstrate that the investments are on a clear and measurable path to social or environmental transition. The introduction of the transition category was designed by ESMA so as not to penalise investment in companies deriving part of their revenues from fossil fuels, thus promoting strategies aimed to foster a path to transition towards a greener economy.
Exclusions
In addition to the minimum threshold of 80% of investments used to meet environmental or social characteristics or sustainable investment objectives, the Guidelines also apply exclusion criteria for different terms used in fund names:
• “Environmental”, “Impact” and “sustainability”-related terms: exclusions according to the rules applicable to Paris-aligned Benchmarks ("PAB"); and
• “Transition, “Social” and “Governance”-related terms: exclusions according to the rules applicable to Climate Transition Benchmarks ("CTB").
Combination terms
Where terms are combined, the provisions should apply cumulatively. ESMA has specified that where "environmental" terms are used in combination with "transition" terms in the name of a fund, the CTB exclusions should apply. ESMA notes that this would, however, not apply for "sustainable" terms, as "sustainable" terms would always give an impression of sustainability irrespective of any other terms used in the name. Accordingly, fund names with combined sustainability-related terms will always need to comply with the PAB and invest meaningfully in sustainable investments. We have set out below a summary of ESMA's recommendations on the use of ESG or sustainability-related terms in funds' names in table format below.
1Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/363 of 31 October 2022 amending and correcting the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 as regards the content and presentation of information in relation to disclosures in pre-contractual documents and periodic reports for financial products investing in environmentally sustainable economic activities.
Authors
Key contacts